Merlin,
> Thanks for bringing the SQL 92 row constructor into spec for
> operations involving > and <. This is just fantastic. I just
> benchmarked ISAM style access to tables on multi-part keys and the
> speedup is tremendous vs. the non row-constructor approach to the
> problem which is tedius to write and only selective to the first part
> of the key. We are talking speedups proportional to the inselectivity
> of the ordering key. While this feature is relatively esoteric, it is
> powerful and belongs in every dba's bag of tricks.
It's esoteric enough that I don't know what you're talking about. Can
you give us an example?
--Josh
