Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha@sollentuna.net]
>>Sent: 30 January 2006 20:22
>>To: Dave Page; Andreas Pflug
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch: Query favourites
>>
>>As for the libxml2/msxml - I think going with *just* libxml2
>>is the way
>>to go. The APIs are so completely different that it would be two
>>completely different implementations. And AFAIK, there are no problems
>>with libxml on Win32 in general.
>
>
> OK, I'll give it a go if I get 5 minutes.
>
>
>>So yeah, that can definitly be done without an unreasonable amount of
>>work. If that means that the feature will "live", I'm fine
>>with looking
>>at that. But I'd like to know that first. (Implementation
>>details aside
>>of course, there can still be more of those to fix - the feature in
>>principle, and the general idea of storing the data in a file in the
>>users homedir etc)
>
>
> I like the idea, and agree with storing the data in the user's home
> directory. The data is definitely going to be too large to store
> sensibly in the registry or an ini file, and storing in the master
> database restricts you to a single server which, like you, would not
> help me much.
I didn't think of one repository per server, but a dedicated repository
server. This would allow roaming regardless of operating systems.
Regards,
Andresa
