Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>As for the libxml2/msxml - I think going with *just* libxml2 is the way
>to go. The APIs are so completely different that it would be two
>completely different implementations. And AFAIK, there are no problems
>with libxml on Win32 in general.
>
>
except for libxml2 not being there by default.
>So yeah, that can definitly be done without an unreasonable amount of
>work. If that means that the feature will "live", I'm fine with looking
>at that. But I'd like to know that first. (Implementation details aside
>of course, there can still be more of those to fix - the feature in
>principle, and the general idea of storing the data in a file in the
>users homedir etc)
>
>
I don't like storing more stuff in files, and in homedir even less. I
even don't like registry/.pgadmin3 (not completely replacable), and
would like some network (db) based solution to copy server connect
strings from.
Regards,
Andreas
