Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>Anyway, it could be rewritten to either not use XML at all,
>>>
>>>
>>or to not
>>
>>
>>>use wxxml (say by linking directly to libxml, which is
>>>
>>>
>>likely to be on
>>
>>
>>>the system already considering how many packages use it). It
>>>
>>>
>>just makes
>>
>>
>>>it easier when you don't have to maintain the code youself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>There must be some XML stuff in std wx, since XRC uses XML,
>>dunno how reusable that is.
>>
>>
>
>It specifically says that the API is not stable and should not be used.
>(http://cvs.wxwidgets.org/viewcvs.cgi/wxWidgets/include/wx/xml/xml.h?rev
>=1.5&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup and friends)
>
>
>
>
>
>>>As for the fact that you can already store them in standard files -
>>>sure you can. It's a matter of convenience.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Still appears as a duplication of features. What's wrong with
>>"recent files"?
>>
>>
>
>No hierarchy, very very limited number of entries, no control over which
>entries go on the list (say when you open a one-time file to run, it
>will still steal a position on the list), no ability to add descriptive
>entries. I'm sure there are more, but that's what I came up with whlie
>typing without needing to think about it.
>
>
>
>
>>Actually, I'd like it better to have a means of adding
>>macros/scripts or so to pgAdmin, i.e. wxPython. This would
>>enable pgAdmin extensions, keeping the pgAdmin core relatively pure.
>>
>>
>
>Sure, that'd be nice. Still, that adds a dependency on *python*, which
>is *huge* compared to wxxml...
>
>
I don't mind adding dependencies if benefits are huge (last addition was
OGL for graphical explain, which is a std wx contrib module). The few
preferred queries I'm using are in some files, and I simply mark and
execute them. That's why I can't see any benefit from such a "favourite"
feature.
>And I don't see the point in this case.
>
The point is, the scripting option I'm thinking of would allow you to
declare your own menu entry for your preferred query (which might
consist of a dialogue, formatting your result) so it's not the query
you're storing, but but the feature/task/whatever. Just as we have a
status display, not just a favourite "select * from pg_status".
Regards,
Andreas
