Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Markus Schaber
Subject Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle
Date
Msg-id 43A9276A.2020608@logix-tt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle  (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Hi, Csaba,

Csaba Nagy wrote:

>>Another possible mapping would be to/from a Java boolean array. This has
>>the problem that a Java array of booleans passed to setObject() should
>>probably be mapped to an array of booleans on the server side, not to a
>>bit(n) type.
>
> What about a java.util.BitSet ? Or does it have to extend PGObject ?

Currently, all Objects have either to be special cased inside the
driver, or extend PGObject (which does not allow binary transfer).

There were several ideas to change this, but AFAIR none of them was
implemented.

Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Csaba Nagy
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle
Next
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle