Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date
Msg-id 439061F6.2020202@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>
>
>>I trimmed it down to:
>>  --with-prefer-libedit   prefer libedit over readline
>>
>>
>
>OK, I can live with that.
>
>
>
>

I think it's ugly. Can't we just say --prefer-libedit ?

If must be a --with-foo flag, maybe --with-libedit-preferred or
--with-libedit-first would be better.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions