Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Date
Msg-id 43906E61.5050008@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
List pgsql-patches

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>BTW, has anyone checked Command Prompt's Subversion
>>repository?  It's a mirror of our anonymous CVS (AFAICT).
>>I'm using it for reading diffs lately, and it's much nicer to
>>look at the whole patch as a single diff rather than going a
>>single file at a time.
>>
>>http://projects.commandprompt.com/projects/public/pgsql/browser/trunk/pgsql
>>
>>It has the additional advantage over our current CVSweb that
>>it's set with tabs to 4 spaces, so it looks just like our
>>code is supposed to ...
>>
>>
>
>Yes, and I for one love it :-)
>
>Now if I could just access the actual svn repository as well, I'd be
>even happier...
>
>
>
>

I have added it to the set of useful links on pgfoundry's front page.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions