Tom Lane wrote:
> I speculate that you did a VACUUM FULL on it recently.
You speculate right, we do a vacuum full every sunday night as a safety
net. So the vacuum full was a week old.
>
> The condition of the indexes suggests strongly that you've not been
> vacuuming pg_attribute often enough (and perhaps not any of the other
> system catalogs, either?). Heavy use of temp tables will cause
> pg_attribute and pg_class to bloat if you don't keep after them.
That's interesting. We stopped using temporary tables because they were
causing us lots of trouble, including table bloat. We vacuum
pg_attribute (and every other table with an entry in pg_tables) every
ten minutes. What other that temp tables could bloat pg_attribute? We
use refcursors to return data from our stored procedures. We also have a
few stored procedures that return SETOF.
Thanks for helping us out on this.
--
David Mitchell
Software Engineer
Telogis
