> On 1 Jul 2025, at 17:11, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
> On 7/1/25 16:24, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> This version has been tested against v17 and v16 where it applies and passes
>> all tests (the latter isn't as assuring as it should be since there is a lack
>> of testcoverage).
>
> Could you elaborate what you mean by lack of test coverage? Doesn't
> pg_dump have TAP tests exercising all compression methods? Perhaps it
> does not exercise all parts of the code, and we could improve that?
Sorry, I was unclear. There are indeed lots of pg_dump tests and all
compression methods are tested (the 0% for Zstd on coverage.pg.org is due to
that instance not being compiled with zstd support) but there are functions
which evade testing like getc_func. It's also quite hard to test all the error
paths as that would require some sort of fault injection.
I don't think the current coverage is cause for holding back this patch, but
there is room for improvement to made in the coming cycle.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
