Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>  
>
>>Here's another version of this patch ;-) I've based it on your patch, so
>>the changes to ovalue etc should sitill be there.
>>    
>>
>
>In the spirit of incremental improvement ... I've taken Magnus' version
>and added the proposed change to re-enable Qingqing's patch by skipping
>WaitForSingleObjectEx altogether in the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS code path.
>I also removed WaitForSingleObjectEx in pgwin32_poll_signals(), which
>AFAICS should be just like CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS.  I think this is what
>we are proposing to actually apply to 8.1beta4.  I can't test it though,
>so please check it over...
>
>  
>

This patch passes regression and demonstrates the expected speedup on my 
machine.

cheers

andrew