Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date
Msg-id 4353D4FC.3080405@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
>  
>
>>What other linkers do we need to support?
>>    
>>
>
>All the non-GNU ones.
>
>(I'm already desperately unhappy about the thin representation of 
>non-GNU toolchains in the build farm...)
>
>
>  
>

Me too. If you provide a list of the most important platforms/toolsets 
missing I will see if I can talk some people into donating resources. 
HPUX is a glaring hole although I know you have that covered personally.

cheers

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tony Caduto
Date:
Subject: Re: More problems with the win32 installer for 8.1 beta3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.