Hello!
I'm interested in SELECT ... FOR SHARE 8.1 feature. I'd tried to measure performance degradation and got something
about30-60% for queries retrieve a lot of rows. Is it realistic estimation? Does this penalty depend on something (data
types,triggers, foreign keys, whatever) significantly? Is any sort of lock escalation [and other unpreditable things]
involvedhere?
Last question. What about ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ syntax since non-exclusive locking for all SELECTs means [as
faras I understand] nothing but REPEATABLE READ?
Thanks.
--
Best regards
Ilja Golshtein
