'Real' auto vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ralph Mason
Subject 'Real' auto vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 4314DBE0.9070708@telogis.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: 'Real' auto vacuum?  (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Re: 'Real' auto vacuum?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
This is a wild and crazy thought which I am sure is invalid for some
good reason.

But why can't postgres just vacuum itself as it goes along?

When a row is orphaned it's added to a list of possibly available rows.
When a new row is needed the list of possible rows is examined and the
first one with a transaction id less then the lowest running transaction
id is chosen to be the new row?  These rows can be in a heap so it's
really fast to find one.

Like magic - no more vacuuming.  No more holes for people to fall into.

Is this an oversimplification of the problem?

Ralph

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: When to do a vacuum for highly active table
Next
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: 'Real' auto vacuum?