>
>> If you still have the budget, I would suggest considering either what
>> Ron suggested or possibly using a 4 drive RAID 10 instead.
>
>
> IME, with only 4 HDs, it's usually better to split them them into two
> RAID 1's (one for the db, one for everything else including the logs)
> than it is to put everything on one RAID 10. YMMV.
Really? That's interesting. My experience is different, I assume SCSI?
Software/Hardware Raid?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> Ron Peacetree
>
