Re: jdbc xa patches - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Oliver Jowett
Subject Re: jdbc xa patches
Date
Msg-id 42E80CBB.1030006@opencloud.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jdbc xa patches  (Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: jdbc xa patches
List pgsql-jdbc
Vadim Nasardinov wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 July 2005 00:33, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>
>>>>Having ResourceAssociationState as a full-blown class seems like
>>>>overkill since you only have one instance anyway.
>>>
>>>Maybe.  Java 1.4 doesn't have enums.  What do you suggest as an
>>>alternative?
>>
>>Just a bare int?
>
>
> Java 1.4's typesafe enum pattern doesn't usually strike me as an
> overkill, as long as you're aware of its problems:
>
>   http://www.google.com/search?q=Java+typesafe+enum

Shrug, the main reason for an enum-like pattern is to get type safety,
but in this case there's only one field that ever uses the enum (and
it's never passed around as a parameter), so there's not much scope for
getting it wrong.

-O

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC JAR Problem
Next
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: smallint mapping issue