Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
>>Sent: 24 June 2005 21:07
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: PostgreSQL-development
>>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DBSize backend integration
>>
>>
>>
>>>>So drop total_relation_size(),
>>>>
>>>>
>>relation_size_components(), and what
>>
>>
>>>>else?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>indexes_size()
>>>
>>>
>>What is the logic for removing that? Because it is an
>>aggregate of all
>>indexes?
>>
>>
>
>Yes, and is of limited use in my opinion. I can see a use for
>pg_relation_size when used on an individual index, but the total of all
>indexes on a relation seems of little real use to me (and is relatively
>easily calculated if it really is required for a more specialised
>purpose).
>
>
>
[from memory] the relation_components function adds components in a
questionable way, e.g. counting on index on the toast table as index. To
me, that's internal implementation detail, and should be counted as
toast table size too.
Regards,
Andreas
