Re: LGPL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Galbavy
Subject Re: LGPL
Date
Msg-id 42B3D085.7060903@knowtion.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LGPL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: LGPL
Re: LGPL
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres
>in a completely non-GPL environment.  If that were not so then I think
>we'd have some license issues.  But the fact that building PG in a
>GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my
>point of view.  You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that
>environment.
>  
>
So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?

Peter


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)