Re: LGPL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LGPL
Date
Msg-id 9219.1119072376@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LGPL  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: LGPL
Re: LGPL
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> With libreadline, we are not taking their code or distributing it, but
>> merely linking to it if it exists. 

> But we are also requiring it. The rpms won't install unless readline is 
> available.

The RPMs require it --- not our source code.  Since the RPMs can only
work atop a GPL OS (Linux), it hardly matters in that context.

What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres
in a completely non-GPL environment.  If that were not so then I think
we'd have some license issues.  But the fact that building PG in a
GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my
point of view.  You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that
environment.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum in the backend
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)