Re: LGPL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LGPL
Date
Msg-id 12236.1119101210@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LGPL  (Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net> writes:
> So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?

No, that's not relevant.  GNU make is a tool, not part of the end
result.

A more interesting question is Autoconf, which we also depend on
as a build tool, and which does copy parts of itself into the
distributed product.  However, Autoconf explicitly releases its
output scripts as entirely free software, not GPL code.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jon Jensen
Date:
Subject: Re: Utility database
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Returning Composite Types from C functions