Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding. - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding.
Date
Msg-id 4293D7EF.9050800@samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding.  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> psql, pg_dump, etc allow password specification from stdin and from
> .pgpass, never on the command line.  There is a reason why they are all
> designed like that.  pg_autovacuum hasn't been studied carefully enough
> I guess, because we should never have let a security hole like this get
> by us.

It has certainly been observed that this is a security problem in the
past. In fact, the pg_autovacuum documentation makes that clear:

-P password: Password pg_autovacuum will use to connect with. *WARNING*
    This option is insecure. When installed as a Windows Service, this
    option will be stored in plain text in the registry. When used with
    most Unix variants, other users will be able to see the argument to
    the "-P" option via ps(1). The ~/.pgpass file can be used to
    specify a password more securely.

I think the reason there is at least some value in having this switch
for pg_autovacuum is that pg_autovacuum is almost exclusively used in a
situation in which the password can't be specified on the command-line
(which is not the case for most of the other command-line tools). Sure,
it isn't secure, but the documentation makes that clear, and security is
not important to everyone -- I can certainly envision users for whom the
command-line flag is convenient.

-Neil

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl tests for currently untested features
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding.