adnandursun@asrinbilisim.com.tr wrote:
> statement_timeout is not a solution if many processes are
> waiting the resource.
Why not?
I think the only problem with using statement_timeout for this purpose
is that the client connection might die during a long-running
transaction at a point when no statement is currently executing. Tom's
suggested transaction_timeout would be a reasonable way to fix this.
Adnan, if you think this is such a significant problem (I can't say that
I agree), I'd encourage you to submit a patch.
-Neil
