Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'd suggest that we shouldn't be modifying the calendar object either.
>
> Without looking at the bug, I'd probably agree with him.
I took a brief look at setTimestamp etc a few weeks ago and they looked
pretty horrible :(
Who's looking after that bit of the code at the moment? It probably
needs an owner at a minimum. (I'd offer to rewrite it, but I have no
time to spend on the driver at the moment..)
-O
