>>We are not building an artificial heart here, we are building a database
>>and databases have been around for decades.
>
>
> Well, ARC seems like a new database idea, at least in the past few
> years. Are you saying ARC is either "ridiculous" or has prior art? I
> know 2Q is similar, but not identical, and ARC does have some small
> improvements over it.
In this case I would say it is both. 2Q should (if not is) be considered
prior art. Otherwise it would not have been as plug-n-play as it was.
Note I am not making light of the work that it took, I couldn't have
done it and I am glad that someone else had to.
Secondly I would say that an ARC patent is ridiculous based on the above
experience.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
