Re: Unexpected behaviour of numeric datatype when mixed with,float4, - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Ezequiel Tolnay
Subject Re: Unexpected behaviour of numeric datatype when mixed with,float4,
Date
Msg-id 4259C31B.3080700@etolnay.com.ar
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unexpected behaviour of numeric datatype when mixed with,float4, domains and plpgsql variables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:

>Ezequiel Tolnay <mail@etolnay.com.ar> writes:
>
>
>>CREATE DOMAIN currency AS numeric(15,4);
>>CREATE TABLE test (id serial, amt currency);
>>CREATE FUNCTION f_test(currency) RETURNS currency AS $$
>>DECLARE n currency;
>>BEGIN n := $1 * 0.2::float4;
>>       INSERT INTO test (amt) VALUES (n); RETURN n;
>>END $$ LANGUAGE PLPGSQL;
>>
>>
>
>plpgsql doesn't currently enforce domain constraints, so the assignment
>to n isn't doing the rounding that you expect.  Until someone gets
>around to fixing that, an explicit coercion is probably what you need:
>
>    n := cast($1 * 0.2::float4 AS currency);
>
>
>
Please note that the critical issue is a column defined as numeric(15,4)
(through the domain alias), but still capable of containing numbers with
higher precision. I wonder how is it possible to store a numeric with
higher precision on a column where the precision is clearly defined. Are
the numeric values stored on a column always variable precision, and the
precision being only enforced on assignment? Wouldn't this impact
heavily in performance and disk space usage?
In any case, it looks like the only flaw is when inserting or updating
with a plpgsql variable into a column defined as a domain for a fixed
precision numeric.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Russell Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1577: round(dp) function does not round to nearest integer properly
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1580: pg_dumpall aborts when cwd is unreadable