RE: Use of "long" in incremental sort code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi

Found one more place needed to be changed(long -> int64).

Also changed the output for int64 data(Debug mode on & define EXEC_SORTDEBUG )

And, maybe there's a typo in " src\backend\executor\nodeIncrementalSort.c" as below.
Obviously, the ">=" is meaningless, right?

-        SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with >= %ld tuples\n", nTuples);
+        SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with %ld tuples\n", nTuples);

Please take a check at the attached patch file.

Previous disscution:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpky%2BUhof8mryPf5i%3D6e6fib2dxHqBrhp0Qhu0NeBhLJw%40mail.gmail.com

Best regards
Tang