Re: DDL in transactions? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Markus Schaber
Subject Re: DDL in transactions?
Date
Msg-id 424C3496.4010506@logix-tt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DDL in transactions?  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Hi, Giuseppe,

Kris Jurka schrieb:
>>My question is: why? Shouldn't DDL be executed immediately?
>
> No.  DDL in postgresql is fully transactable and may be rolled back or
> committed.  That doesn't explain why the above code doesn't work.
> Because the two executeUpdates are on the same Statement on the same
> Connection the second execution should see the newly created table because
> it is in the same transaction.  Perhaps you are not showing us the real
> code you are using and you actually have two connections?

You can simply try this out via psql:

lwgeom=# begin;
BEGIN
lwgeom=# create table tester (a int);
CREATE TABLE
lwgeom=# insert into tester values (1);
INSERT 281855490 1
lwgeom=# rollback;
ROLLBACK
lwgeom=# select * from tester;
ERROR:  relation "tester" does not exist
lwgeom=#

HTH,
Markus

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Giuseppe Sacco
Date:
Subject: Re: DDL in transactions?
Next
From: "Nico"
Date:
Subject: only postgresqsl in connection pool