Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Date
Msg-id 4236.1207242598@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks. I had another concern about VACUUM not reporting DEAD line
> pointers (please see up thread). Any comments on that ?

If you want to work on that, go ahead, but I wanted it separate because
I didn't think it merited back-patching.  It's strictly cosmetic in
terms of being about what VACUUM VERBOSE prints, no?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 8.3.x doesn't get build
Next
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: Secure "where in(a,b,c)" clause.