Tom Lane wrote:
>=?windows-1250?Q?Miroslav_=8Aulc?= <miroslav.sulc@startnet.cz> writes:
>
>
>>shared_buffers = 48000 # min 16, at least max_connections*2,
>>8KB each
>>work_mem = 1024 # min 64, size in KB
>>maintenance_work_mem = 16384 # min 1024, size in KB
>>max_stack_depth = 2048 # min 100, size in KB
>>
>>
>
>Hmm. Given the small size of the auxiliary tables, you'd think they'd
>fit in 1MB work_mem no problem. But try bumping work_mem up to 10MB
>just to see if it makes a difference. (BTW, you do know that altering
>the .conf file doesn't in itself do anything? You have to SIGHUP the
>postmaster to make it notice the change ... and for certain parameters
>such as shared_buffers, you actually have to stop and restart the
>postmaster. You can use the SHOW command to verify whether a change
>has taken effect.)
>
>
I've tried to set work_mem to 10240, restarted postmaster and tried the
EXPLAIN ANALYZE but there is only cca 200 ms speedup.
>>I have checked this and there are some JOINs smallint against integer.
>>Is that problem?
>>
>>
>That probably explains why some of the joins are merges instead of
>hashes --- hash join doesn't work across datatypes. Doesn't seem like
>it should be a huge problem though. I was more concerned about the
>possibility of slow locale-dependent string comparisons.
>
>
There are only JOINs number against number. I've tried to change one of
the fields from smallint to integer but there was no speedup.
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Miroslav
