Tom Lane schrieb:
>Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
>
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Maybe a conflict on referenced foreign-key rows?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>can you explain how that happens?
>>
>>
>
>When you insert or update a row in a table that has an FK reference,
>it takes out a row-level lock on the referenced row in the master table.
>This is needed to prevent someone else from deleting the master row
>before commit. (Since the someone else can't see your uncommitted row,
>nothing but a lock could stop them from thinking it's OK to remove the
>master row.)
>
>So if two sessions are trying to insert rows that reference the same
>master row, they conflict --- because the only type of row-level lock
>we have at the moment is exclusive. I believe Alvaro is looking into
>supporting shared row-level locks for 8.1, which'd make this problem
>go away.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
Ok I think thats the problem.. because
client1:
...
conn.setAutoCommit(false)
insert into liefAdress(adress,postcode)
//id is autoincrement
insert into liefAdress(adress2,postcode2)
....
....
postcode is a FK to a list with postcodes. When I want insert different
postcodes they are no locked.. there is only locked when the postcode are
same. But why there are locked? Have anybody a good
Idea to deal with this problem..?
