Re: make update-po problem with USE_PGXS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: make update-po problem with USE_PGXS
Date
Msg-id 421090ae-62d8-2056-9b8c-44a65798a4c4@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to make update-po problem with USE_PGXS  ("wangsh.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangsh.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01.11.21 04:56, wangsh.fnst@fujitsu.com wrote:
> I'm developing an extension, after modifying some source file(add some message
> like gettext('xxxxx')) and execute
>> $ make USE_PGXS=1 update-po
>> make: Nothing to be done for 'update-po'.
> I feel strange because I think *.po.new files should be created.

I don't think the NLS makefiles were ever adjusted to work with PGXS. 
It's not surprising to me that some amount of adjustment appears to be 
necessary to make the paths right.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 2