Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip kumar
Subject Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Date
Msg-id 4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA9135266351C2E@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
List pgsql-hackers

On 11 September 2014 10:21, Amit kapila Wrote,

 

>I don't think currently such a limitation is mentioned in docs,

>however I think we can update the docs at below locations:

 

>1. In description of pg_start_backup in below page:

>2. In Explanation of Base Backup, basically under heading

>Making a Base Backup Using the Low Level API at below

>page:

 

>In general, we can explain about symlink_label file where ever

>we are explaining about backup_label file.

 

>If you think it is sufficient to explain about symlink_label in

>above places, then I can update the patch.

 

I think this will be sufficient….

 

 

Regards,

Dilip

 

 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect initialization of sentPtr in walsender.c
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW