Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Date
Msg-id 4201.1456905108@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> Yes, that's the problem. Instead of using details(), summary() is
>> enough actually. And it is enough to let caller know the failure when
>> just one test has been found as not passing. See attached.

> This one works for me on RHEL6.  Pushed; we'll see if the older
> buildfarm members like it.

I don't normally run the TAP tests on "prairiedog", because it's
too $!*&@ slow, but trying that manually seems to work.  That's
the Perl 5.8.6 that Apple shipped with OS X 10.4 ... if there's
anything older in our buildfarm, I don't know about it.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding support for sequence advances
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.