Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Date
Msg-id 27801.1456898853@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, that's the problem. Instead of using details(), summary() is
> enough actually. And it is enough to let caller know the failure when
> just one test has been found as not passing. See attached.

This one works for me on RHEL6.  Pushed; we'll see if the older
buildfarm members like it.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: 2016-03 Commitfest Manager
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: GetExistingLocalJoinPath() vs. the docs