Re: -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures
Date
Msg-id 41FAB64F.7020904@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>The way buildfarm works is that it should always run on a clean set of 
>>CVS files - i.e. there should no gram.c. We don't even bot6her with 
>>clean, distclean, maintainer-clean and friends - we simply copy the 
>>source directory tree for each run. The fact that Darcy's builds don't 
>>show a call to bison indicates to me that his source dir ( 
>>/buildfarm/pg-buildfarm/HEAD/pgsql ) might not be clean for some reason 
>>that is not clear to me.
>>    
>>
>
>Hmm, source directory used for a build and then not maintainer-clean'd
>perhaps?
>  
>

That would do it. Basically the user should not touch anything inside 
<buildroot>, any more that they should touch anything in <datadir>/base.

>If you do the copy without -p then the copy would tend to lose the
>timestamps that would show that the gram.c file is out of date.
>I suppose "cp -p" would be a bad idea because of permissions issues,
>but you could consider replacing the cp with "tar cf - | tar xf -"
>to preserve timestamps better.
>
>
>  
>

If we needed to, yes. rsync also works very nicely on stuff like this - 
and I have been using it in my day job for such a purpose. But I think 
the answer in this case is "don't do that." Darcy has cleaned out his 
source directory and all now seems well.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
Next
From: Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Date:
Subject: Re: Group-count estimation statistics