Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date
Msg-id 41F02781.4080309@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Ron Mayer wrote:

> http://research.microsoft.com/research/pubs/view.aspx?msr_tr_id=MSR-TR-2002-53

Wrong link...

http://research.microsoft.com/research/pubs/view.aspx?type=Technical%20Report&id=812

This is the one that discusses scalability, price, performance,
failover, power consumption, hardware components, etc.

Bottom line was that the large server with SAN had $1877K hardware costs
while the application-partitioned cluster had $110K hardware costs --
but it's apples-to-oranges since they were deployed in different years.

Still a big advantage for the small systems.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft