Re: ntfs for windows port rc5-2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From J. Greenlees
Subject Re: ntfs for windows port rc5-2
Date
Msg-id 41E84A75.5060004@telus.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ntfs for windows port rc5-2  ("Frank D. Engel, Jr." <fde101@fjrhome.net>)
Responses Re: ntfs for windows port rc5-2
List pgsql-general
Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You may wish to consider a different database for your project. SQLite
> may be a better choice, for example, depending on the project's specific
> needs (www.sqlite.org).
>
> Win95/98/ME is poor technology, no matter how many users it still has.
> It's probably about time for them to upgrade or switch to another OS (of
> course, I think Windows in general is a poor technology, but that's for
> another list...).
>
> OTOH, does anyone know if the cygwin version of postgresql enforces the
> NTFS requirement?  That may be another option...
>

I'll check sqllite out, thanks for the tip on it.

not sure about the cygwin, but don't really want to cause clients to
have to install and run extra services that shouldn't be needed.

I agree about windows, not worth using at all.
--
========================================

only plain text format email accepted.

smaller file size, no virus transfer
no proprietary file formats.

========================================

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Parsing of backslash in statements via ODBC
Next
From: Wes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)