Re: Extensions User Design - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Extensions User Design
Date
Msg-id 41D5C9F0-BDB9-4324-98D8-D6B73B0C4662@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions User Design  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Extensions User Design  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jun 25, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> The problem is, I think, that the Makefile format is way too  
>> flexible.
>
> I think the contrib makefiles are considered to be our standard test
> suite for PGXS.  If a 3rd-party makefile is doing anything not
> represented in contrib, it's not guaranteed to work anyway.  So I'd
> be plenty satisfied if we just made the existing contrib  
> infrastructure
> work for 3rd-party modules.

Is there no platform-independent build system we could take advantage  
of?

One reason the Perl community is (very gradually) moving away from  
ExtUtils::MakMaker towards Module::Build (pure Perl installer) is to  
minimize such issues. I realize that we don't depend on Perl on Unix  
platforms, so it wouldn't make sense to use its build system for our  
extensions, but perhaps there's something else we could do?

Best,

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design