Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
Date
Msg-id 41ACFF96.6090501@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
List pgsql-jdbc
Well, I'm not going to defend the spec, as it's broken in a few places.

However there is no setTimestamp without timezone.

Dave

Tom Lane wrote:

>Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
>
>
>>Kris Jurka wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Since timestamp without timezone is a postgresql extension
>>>>
>>>>
>>>This is not true.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well, one of them must be an extension so it is timestampz ?
>>
>>
>
>timestamp with and without timezone are both required by the SQL
>standard.  If JDBC only supports one of them I'd think the JDBC
>spec is a tad broken.
>
>            regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
>
>

--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "Éric Paré"
Date:
Subject: Re: Need a performance tip - Statement pooling for server
Next
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?