Re: VACUUM FULL FREEZE is unsafe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: VACUUM FULL FREEZE is unsafe
Date
Msg-id 41ACA604.2000504@Yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM FULL FREEZE is unsafe  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/27/2004 7:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F.O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
>> So why not have VACUUM FULL FREEZE just do what you propose: VACUUM 
>> FULL then VACUUM FREEZE.
> 
> The objective is to make it more safe, not less so.  Doing that would
> require rewriting a whole bunch of code, which I am not up for at this
> stage of the release cycle.

If the proper fix is too invasive for 8.0, then making FULL and FREEZE 
mutually exclusive is IMHO the right thing to do for 8.0.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0beta5 results w/ dbt2
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Opinions on Usenet ...