Re: multiline CSV fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: multiline CSV fields
Date
Msg-id 41AB23D4.6040509@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: multiline CSV fields  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: multiline CSV fields
List pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Tom Lane wrote:
>  
>
>>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>    
>>
>>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Which we do not have, because pg_dump doesn't use CSV.  I do not think
>>>>this is a must-fix, especially not if the proposed fix introduces
>>>>inconsistencies elsewhere.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Sure, pg_dump doesn't use it but COPY should be able to load anything it
>>>output.
>>>      
>>>
>>I'd buy into that proposition if CSV showed any evidence of being a
>>sanely defined format, but it shows every indication of being neither
>>well-defined, nor self-consistent, nor even particularly portable.
>>I suggest adjusting your expectations.  All I expect from that code is
>>being able to load the majority of data from the more popular Microsloth
>>applications.  Trying to achieve 100% consistency for corner cases is
>>just going to interfere with the real use-case for the feature, which is
>>coping with output from applications that aren't very consistent in the
>>first place.
>>    
>>
>
>OK, then should we disallow dumping out data in CVS format that we can't
>load?  Seems like the least we should do for 8.0.
>
>  
>

As Tom rightly points out, having data make the round trip was not the 
goal of the exercise. Excel, for example, has no trouble reading such 
data (or at least my installation of it).

Personally I consider CSVs with line end chars embedded in fields to be 
broken anyway, but this was something that was specifically mentioned 
when we were discussing requirements, which is why I coded for it.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: multiline CSV fields