Tom Lane wrote:
>Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>
>
>>The Linux [ext2] fsync man page says:
>>"It does not necessarily ensure that the entry in the directory
>>containing the file has also reached disk. For that an explicit fsync on
>>the file descriptor of the directory is also needed."
>>
>>
>
>This seems so broken as to defy belief. A process creating a file
>doesn't normally *have* a file descriptor for the parent directory,
>and I don't think the concept of an FD for a directory is even
>portable (opendir() certainly doesn't return an FD). One might also
>ask if we are expected to fsync everything up to the root in order
>to be sure that the file remains accessible, and how exactly we should
>do that on directories we don't have write access for.
>
>
The notes say this:
When an ext2 file system is mounted with the sync option,
directory entries are also implicitly synced by fsync.
cheers
andrew
