Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date
Msg-id 4183.1193176708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> asciiword
>>> word
>>> numword

> No huge preference, but I see benefit in what Gregory was saying re:  
> asciiword, alphaword, alnumword. word itself is pretty general, while  
> alphaword ties it much closer to its intended meaning. They've got  
> pretty consistent lengths as well. Maybe it leans too Hungarian.

I stuck with the previous proposal, mainly because I was already pretty
well into making the edits by the time I saw your message.  But I think
that with this definition "word" matches pretty well with everyone's
understanding of that, and the other two are supersets and subsets that
might have specific uses.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4