Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition
Date
Msg-id 4181.1500567246@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> Per the docs:
> "If there are no common column names, NATURAL behaves like CROSS JOIN."

> I'm being a bit pedantic here but since NATURAL is a replacement for
> "ON/USING" it would seem more consistent to describe it, when no matching
> columns are found, as "behaves like specifying ON TRUE" instead.

Yeah, the analogy to CROSS JOIN falls down if it's an outer join.
I'll go fix that.

> I find it a bit strange, though not surprising, that it doesn't devolve to
> "ON FALSE".

No, it's normal that an AND of no conditions degenerates to TRUE.
It's like omitting a WHERE clause.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increase Vacuum ring buffer.
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] autovacuum can't keep up, bloat just continues to rise