Re: rmtree() failure on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: rmtree() failure on Windows
Date
Msg-id 417E8CEE.8030306@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rmtree() failure on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>Here is some more info. Below is a trace from dropdb. There is a loop 
>>around the rmdir() calls which I have set to time out at 600 seconds. 
>>The call eventually succeeds after around 300 seconds (I've seen this 
>>several times). It looks like we are the victim of some caching - the 
>>directory still thinks it has some of the files it has told us we have 
>>deleted successfully.
>>    
>>
>
>If you rescan the directory after deleting the files, does it show
>as empty?
>  
>

No! That's how I got the list of "files it still thinks are there". 
Gross, eh?

>  
>
>>Bottom line, this is a real mess. Surely postgres is not the only 
>>application in the world that wants to be able to delete a directory 
>>tree reliably on Windows. What do other apps do?
>>    
>>
>
>I'm wondering if this is a side effect of the way win32_open does
>things.  It's hard to believe that rmdir is that bogus in general,
>but perhaps win32_open is causing us to exercise a corner case?
>
>
>  
>

I don't know. I tried to reproduce it in a simple case using 
fopen/fclose and wasn't able to.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: New compile warnings in CVS
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New compile warnings in CVS