Re: A couple of questions - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc
From | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Subject | Re: A couple of questions |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4177DCA8.6000404@fastcrypt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | A couple of questions (Paul Tomblin <tomblin@ei.kodak.com>) |
Responses |
Re: A couple of questions
|
List | pgsql-jdbc |
Paul, The problem is likely a bug in the driver, the server doesn't have any issues with this query. The difference between the jars is which jdk is used. The one you are using is for a java version 1.1, which version of java are you using? Dave Paul Tomblin wrote: > I'm using Postgres from a RedHat RPM postgresql-jdbc-7.2.4-5.73 on an > installed base of a few hundred RedHat 7.3 machines. (Upgrading to > Fedora Core 2 is in the not-near-enough future.) For historical > reasons, our Java code uses the /usr/share/pgsql/jdbc7.1-1.1.jar that > comes in that RPM, even though there are three other jars with higher > version numbers. > > On these systems, we have several programs that access the database, > and some of them are multi-threaded. There is one table in particular > that's giving me trouble. It has a bunch of configuration parameters > stored as keys and values, with both the keys and values being > character strings. The initial key/value pairs are loaded in at > creation time, but they are frequently updated using "UPDATE sys_info > SET VALUE = ? WHERE KEY = ?". > > cosdb=> \d sys_info > Table "sys_info" > Column | Type | Modifiers > --------+------------------------+----------- > key | character varying(50) | not null > value | character varying(128) | > Primary key: sys_info_pkey > > Occassionally, one of the programs will suddenly act like one of the > keys disappeared. Either I'll get a null pointer exception in > org.postgresql.jdbc2.ResultSet.next(ResultSet.java:116) or I'll get a > NumberFormatException when parsing one of the values that should > always be an integer. As far as I can tell, at the time this happens > there are no other threads in that program updating the database in > any way, although there is a distinct possibility that another program > is doing so. > > So my questions to you: > > 1. Are there any known concurrency issues where one program is doing > an UPDATE on a table when another program is doing a query on it? > > 2. If there are known problems, would putting the UPDATE in a > transaction help? > > 3. What is the diffence between the various jdbc*.jar files in the > RPM, and should I switch to one of the other ones? > > Thank you. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
pgsql-jdbc by date: