Dennis Gearon wrote:
> Google probably is much bigger, and on mainframes, and probably Oracle
> or DB2.
Google uses a Linux cluster and there database is HUGE. I do not know
which database
they use. I bet they built their own specifically for what they do.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> But the table I am worried about is the one sized >= 3.6 GIGA records.
>
> Tino Wildenhain wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Do, den 21.10.2004 schrieb Dennis Gearon um 1:30:
>>
>>> I am designing something that may be the size of yahoo, google,
>>> ebay, etc.
>>>
>>> Just ONE many to many table could possibly have the following
>>> characteristics:
>>>
>>> 3,600,000,000 records
>>> each record is 9 fields of INT4/DATE
>>>
>>> Other tables will have about 5 million records of about the same size.
>>>
>>> There are lots of scenarios here to lessson this.
>>>
>>> BUT, is postgres on linux, maybe necessarily a 64 bit system,
>>> cabable of this? And there'd be 4-5 indexes on that table.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure. Why not? 3...5mio records is not really a problem.
>> We had bigger tables with historic commercial transactions
>> (even on an old dual PIII/1000) with fine performance.
>> I bet however, yahoo, google at least are much bigger :-)
>>
>> Regards
>> Tino
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
