Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some
Date
Msg-id 416E009F.3010709@Yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-performance
On 10/14/2004 12:22 AM, Greg Stark wrote:

> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Which would require that shared memory is not allowed to be swapped out, and
>> that is allowed in Linux by default IIRC, not to completely distort the entire
>> test.
>
> Well if it's getting swapped out then it's clearly not being used effectively.

Is it really that easy if 3 different cache algorithms (PG cache, kernel
buffers and swapping) are competing for the same chips?


Jan

>
> There are APIs to bar swapping out pages and the tests could be run without
> swap. I suggested it only as an experiment though, there are lots of details
> between here and having it be a good configuration for production use.
>


--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin