Re: two digit years in inserts - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Justin Wyer
Subject Re: two digit years in inserts
Date
Msg-id 4164028A.9090404@isogo.co.za
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: two digit years in inserts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: two digit years in inserts
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:

>Justin Wyer <justin@isogo.co.za> writes:
>
>
>>I have this problem, I wrote a script to insert data into a table, one
>>of the columns is a birthdate now I only have the last two year digits,
>>and this all worked fine. Until I did a portupgrade (i am running on bsd
>>5.2.1 and 4.8 and postgresql 7.3.6 & 7.3.7 respectively) script worked
>>fine before the upgrade, now however, any year before 70 gets inserted
>>as 20xx and not 19xx.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>My question is between which versions did this behaviour change, and is
>>there any way for me to force the old behaviour?
>>
>>
>
>Don't you think it's time to fix your data?  2-digit years were a bad
>idea from the get-go, but it was possible to get away with it for awhile
>near the end of a century.
>
>            regards, tom lane
>
>
its not my data i am stuck moving this data from a sad access database
designed by a moron. anyway it means i will have to do alot of work on
the script to make it fix that, or just install an old version of pgsql
on a box here and pg_dump the table which seems easier.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: two digit years in inserts
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Random not so random