Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>This violates the message style guidelines, IMHO.
>
>
>>My first impression is that it should be swapped. The error is that the
>>file could not be opened. The detail is that the files is related to
>>transaction status information.
>
>
> No, the error is that the transaction status couldn't be accessed. The
> fact that it is stored in a file is implementation detail, and primary
> messages should not focus on implementation detail.
Right, so the only way a DBA have is to look the details! Is there another
way to know the file and the offset a transaction belong to ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
