Re: v17 Possible Union All Bug - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andrei Lepikhov
Subject Re: v17 Possible Union All Bug
Date
Msg-id 41499cc3-31a1-4c9e-85d6-45e6d901ea6a@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: v17 Possible Union All Bug  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: v17 Possible Union All Bug  (Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 30/1/2024 04:45, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:32 PM David G. Johnston
> <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:19 AM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:36 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 13:19, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Are the results correct if you SET enable_presorted_aggregate=0;?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Apparently I didn't reply-all...
>>>
>>> Yes, the problem goes away when I disabled presorted_aggregate
>>>
>>> I'll see if that knowledge can help build a better reproducer.
>>>
>>
>> I've deferred doing a better reproducer for the moment, I reliably got:
>> initdb
>> psql --file ~/unionall-repro.sql
>> psql -c 'select * from rolegraph.role_graph_broken;'
>>
>>    oid  | role_type |      rolname       | rolsuper |                administration
>> -------+-----------+--------------------+----------+-----------------------------------------------
>>   16390 | User      | u6_green_leader_su | f        | mog of g6a_fixedops_manager_su from superuser+
>>         |           |                    |          | mog of g6c_service_manager_su from superuser +
>>         |           |                    |          | mog of g6d_service_advisor_su from superuser +
>>         |           |                    |          | mog of g6e_service_tech_su from superuser    +
>>         |           |                    |          | mog of g6c_service_manager_su from cr_admin
>> (1 row)
>>
>> to be produced for the bad bisect result and the correct nested result for *manager* to produce on the good result.
> 
> 
> Thank you for noticing.  I'm investigating this.
Very curious bug. I simplified the test a bit (see in attachment), but 
still can't replace system tables, like pg_authid, with a plain table. 
Will try further.

-- 
regards,
Andrei Lepikhov
Postgres Professional

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: vishnu rao
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18320: Duplicate primary key records in table
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: BUG #18320: Duplicate primary key records in table